Issues with Homoeopathy and this software
On Homoeopathy
To many, Homoeopathy is nonsense. Well, it is so, because a
`remedy' without a single molecule is nonsensical, as far as our current
science is concerned.
With that out of our minds, does Homoeopathy work? It seems to, at least
to many of us. Then how does it work? Forget all that! Let's get down to
business.
On Homoeopim
The name
Ha! Ha! It should have been OpenHomoeopathy, right? Wrong! I need pim,
poom, pook, etc. to make things work. Why? Ha! Ha!
The software as on 22/4/2025
A doctor whom you can beat up is way better than this suite of
programmes for the following reasons:
-
We have a minuscule team and even a rudimentary entry on the >1000
remedies
listed in Kent's repertory will require at least another five years,
even after neglecting a host of sub-rubrics, as we are doing now.
-
There has been a huge increase in the number of symptoms/rubrics in
recent years. Many new remedies have also appeared. These are not
included in the old and free Materia Medicas and Repertories that we
are consulting. This new material is available in commercial software
that most serious doctors use nowadays. This situation will remain
until something can be done about it.
-
Experienced doctors reject many symptoms as `peripheral' and concern
themselves with the `core'. We do not know how to do that but are toying
with the idea of using something like random forests, adaboost, etc.
to make the system gain `experience'. We may use genetic algorithms also
to tweak the scores in `symptom_remedy_map' to make the prescriptions
approach that of experienced physicians. But all that is in some misty
future!
-
Body language and facial expressions are important `symptoms' that good
Homoeopaths lay great emphasis on. Maybe someday, our software will use
the web-cam to do something similar with emotion recognition. But someday
is not today.
-
Mental symptoms are extremely important. Doctors just allow the patient to
talk on and on and like the psychologists of yore, collect rubrics. These
will not be available through simple questions and answers. However,
maybe some of the test pictures and anecdotes/reactions used by
psychiatrists could help. That module is not there.
-
Some people, like Dr. Sehgal, have used metaphoric mappings of rubrics
to tangible symptoms. This method appears to be promising in chronic
cases. This will be almost impossible to implement until genuine AI
comes along.
Upshot
Please do not judge Homoeopathy on the basis of this very
rudimentary and inadequate software! We are basically grossly
under-powered.